Talk:Main Page

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Great blog: new section)
(Undo revision 4408 by 60.217.248.68 (Talk))
Line 111: Line 111:
  
 
[[User:Timd|Timd]] 16:57, 5 April 2009 (CEST)
 
[[User:Timd|Timd]] 16:57, 5 April 2009 (CEST)
 
== Great blog ==
 
 
Long time lurker, thought I would say hello! I really dont post much but thanks for the good times I have here. Love this place..
 
 
  When I was hurt in that car accident my life would be changed eternally.  Unfortunately that driver had no car insurance and I was going to be hurting for ever.
 
 
This was not time for me to start and guess what to do. I had to find a good personal injury attorney to help me get what I needed. After all, my family was counting on me.
 
 
How terrible was it? I has bedridden for 3 months, I had to have constant care and my medical bills went through the roof!
 
 
Gratefully, I found a good referral site to help me.
 
 
I will post more later this afternoon to tell you more about what I have been going through.
 
 
Anwyas thanks for the good work keep it up!
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In practice, legal jurisdictions exercise their right to determine who is recognized as being a lawyer; as a result, the meaning of the term "lawyer" may vary from place to place.<>]
 
 
    * In Australia the word "lawyer" is used to refer to both barristers and solicitors (whether in private practice or practising as corporate in-house counsel).
 
    * In Canada, the word "lawyer" only refers to individuals who have been called to the bar or have qualified as civil law notaries in the province of Quebec. Common law lawyers in Canada may also be known as "barristers and solicitors", but should not be referred to as "attorneys", since that term has a different meaning in Canadian usage. However, in Quebec, civil law advocates (or avocats in French) often call themselves "attorney" and sometimes "barrister and solicitor".
 
    * In England and Wales, "lawyer" is used loosely to refer to a broad variety of law-trained persons. It includes practitioners such as barristers, solicitors, legal executives and licensed conveyancers; and people who are involved with the law but do not practise it on behalf of individual clients, such as judges, court clerks, and drafters of legislation.
 
    * In India, the term "lawyer" is often colloquially used, but the official term is "advocate" as prescribed under the Advocates Act, 1961.<>]
 
    * In Scotland, the word "lawyer" refers to a more specific group of legally trained people. It specifically includes advocates and solicitors. In a generic sense, it may also include judges and law-trained support staff.
 
    * In the United States, the term generally refers to attorneys who may practice law; it is never used to refer to patent agents<>] or paralegals.<>]
 
    * Other nations tend to have comparable terms for the analogous concept.
 

Revision as of 15:24, 28 April 2010

Contents

Hello world!

The wiki is growing and growing :) :) :)

Jan 11:37, 2 November 2006 (CET)

Hope you like it

I hope you like the new layout of the front page.

Jan 15:46, 4 November 2006 (CET)

Minor suggestion

Yes, the new layout's good. I wondered if the overview material - the stuff it's most useful to read first - should be on the top left, rather than the nitty-gritty of installation and so on...

Jon W

Feel free to change the order of the elements on the front page.
Jan 23:35, 5 November 2006 (CET)

Structure of pages

Anyone have some insight into how we are going to want to structure the content for this wiki ? For example, the Localization page is linked from the Main page, but at the moment, it is ambiguous in that some localization related information is contained in subpages so to say, while other information is contained on the Localization page itself. I haven't spend much time working on wiki's before, so it would be interesting if someone with a bit more knowledge, or a bit more common sense would be able to give some pointers concerning this. It might also be interesting to create a page specifically as an introduction as to how to structure content.

Bart.vandendriessche 09:19, 6 December 2006 (CET)

I also see the need to improve the site structure. I think we should reduce the size of the main page a bit such that a logical navigation structure remains. I have started to do this today by moving some things and creating new pages. The list of available modules and the list of third party integration howtos are now in their own pages. I expect them to grow and the Main page would get less and less legible if we added all new items to it.

I added a Section "Trouble Shooting" which was missing. I would like to see this section answer/link to threads about important and recurring questions from the mailing list. The frequent ones could as well go into the FAQ (which I just discovered yesterday, the link is somewhat unfortunately placed at the left navigation, but I did not notice it there, may be it's not just me but also the newbies, and the FAQ link should be placed somewhere else on the Main page).

There are quite a lot of links to unwritten pages in the administration section on the left side. Those could be reduced. (I think they are unwritten because it's not attractive to anyone to create that sort of screenshot-based documentation already available in the OpenCms book. But I think it's worth to add information which is missing in the book: why are things as they are, background information and good examples and best practice recommendations. Our aim should be to make the Wiki the place with the best available documentation on OpenCms.)

User:Cschoenfeld 6 December 2006 (CET)

I have added a link to the FAQ on the frontpage: "If you are a newbie you should take a look at the OpenCms FAQ."

Jan 14:08, 7 December 2006 (CET)

Here is my suggestion regarding Jan's proposal to restructure the front page: it could be divided into sections based on the different groups of visitors.

  • Users
  • Administrators
  • Developers

Each item in this list should include a short explanation and link to the most important subsections. The start page for each group of readers should contain

  • required knowledge
  • how to get started
  • the concepts and tasks in this area
  • where to get help
  • where to find documentation
  • how to handle problems
  • best practices

We could start doing that by introducing just the small list of group links (Users, Administrators, Developers) at the top of the main page and move things into the subsections step by step.

Cschoenfeld 11:17, 12 December 2006 (CET)
I would also propose to use that division also in the URLs of the different pages, i.e.:
- Users/Introduction Users/Workplace...
- Admin/Installation Admin/Performance_tuning...
- Devel/Environment Devel/Modules Devel/Debugging...
It will be a little difficult at first, but i think that will clarify the wiki structure.
--Hnzekto 09:41, 13 December 2006 (CET)


I added a new page: New_Main_Page which we can use as a sandbox for restructuring the frontpage. We should use the category function of mediawiki to restructure the content, take a look at the mediawiki homepage: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Category

Jan 22:58, 13 December 2006 (CET)

type IDs

Hello all,

a (at least to me) major problem is the missing registrar for type IDs (which, as you all know, must be unique within an installation). I suggest adding a WIKI subsection where we can "register" IDs. It will be inoffical as long as Alcacon won't take over the responsibility, but in the meantime, this may ease the potential problems.

We could split the number range into sections used by / reserved for Alcacon (aka "the OpenCms product"), other publically available modules, and a "private" section of IDs that we can repeatedly use for development and/or site-internal modules.

Does anyone mind such a section or does something alike already exist?

Regards, Jens

Howdy!

New member here, never used a wiki before, so please don't hesitate to email me if I'm doing something wrong!

Just learning openCMS but fast to learn and i have plenty of insight into making this software easier for beginners.

I'll try to discuss sections that need updating but could use some technical help when i can not access the IRC chatroom.

Any suggestions or questions for me, I'm here to help, so any help i can be for newbies let me know, i love to write long-winded explanations


Basic content editing guide?

Is there a guide for basic content editing anywhere?

We have an OpenCMS installation all set up. We have some non-web-expert people who need to be trained in basic content editors.

From a quick look I can't see suitable documentation on the wiki or elsewhere for that matter.

Maybe Explorer view page was intended to be a starting point

-- Harry Wood 14:25, 3 September 2008 (CEST)


Great work. Where to ask questions?

Hello, this site is awesome for a person like me who is fairly new to opencms. I think there are areas of the this website and the product that i understand very well and others that i dont understand too well. How do I ask questions on this site and how do i answer questions asked by others? Probable answer is going to be "post to forums", however, i like the idea that someone asks a question and the answer is dished out in terms of an article on the wiki instead of an email which gets buried under the thousands of emails that are out here... Maybe, I can start up a "Questions" page for this? What do you think?

Timd 16:57, 5 April 2009 (CEST)

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox